<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The First Human Clones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boldlygo.org/the-first-human-clones/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boldlygo.org/the-first-human-clones</link>
	<description>Science Fiction, Philosophy, and the Future...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:32:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.boldlygo.org/the-first-human-clones/comment-page-1#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 03:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boldlygo.org/blog/the-first-human-clones/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>After watching the documentary, I feel it would an important event, should Dr. Zavos and his team were to create a clone through pregnancy.  I believe Zavos believes he would be helping infertile couples have children when they cannot do so by conventional methods.  However, when Zavos states there is a 70% chance the human being may come out with abnormalities, I don&#039;t think it would be the right thing to do.  It&#039;s not like he&#039;s experimenting with an inanimate object- or animals as he has done in the past.  This is a human baby, an innocent human life.  If the baby is born with any type of defect, Zavos will be viewed as a monster.  I will not view him this way but I will view him as a scientist that jumped the gun before he looked at all the angles of this &quot;experiment&quot;.  Zavos and team should be more certain of what the outcome will be experimenting with an innocent human life.

Anyway, I&#039;m glad you brought this story to light.  It&#039;s very controversial.  It&#039;s those non black and white issues that are the most interesting to talk about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After watching the documentary, I feel it would an important event, should Dr. Zavos and his team were to create a clone through pregnancy.  I believe Zavos believes he would be helping infertile couples have children when they cannot do so by conventional methods.  However, when Zavos states there is a 70% chance the human being may come out with abnormalities, I don&#8217;t think it would be the right thing to do.  It&#8217;s not like he&#8217;s experimenting with an inanimate object- or animals as he has done in the past.  This is a human baby, an innocent human life.  If the baby is born with any type of defect, Zavos will be viewed as a monster.  I will not view him this way but I will view him as a scientist that jumped the gun before he looked at all the angles of this &#8220;experiment&#8221;.  Zavos and team should be more certain of what the outcome will be experimenting with an innocent human life.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m glad you brought this story to light.  It&#8217;s very controversial.  It&#8217;s those non black and white issues that are the most interesting to talk about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

