<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Towards a Typology of Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boldlygo.org/towards-a-typology-of-marriage/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boldlygo.org/towards-a-typology-of-marriage</link>
	<description>Science Fiction, Philosophy, and the Future...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 15:44:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.boldlygo.org/towards-a-typology-of-marriage/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boldlygo.org/blog/towards-a-typology-of-marriage/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>16 different combinations.  Imagine that.  I say we shouldn&#039;t wait for the future to start these options on marriage.  Let the future be NOW.  It would certainly spice things up a bit.  But please, don&#039;t tell my wife.

A very insightful post, I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16 different combinations.  Imagine that.  I say we shouldn&#8217;t wait for the future to start these options on marriage.  Let the future be NOW.  It would certainly spice things up a bit.  But please, don&#8217;t tell my wife.</p>
<p>A very insightful post, I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Page</title>
		<link>http://www.boldlygo.org/towards-a-typology-of-marriage/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boldlygo.org/blog/towards-a-typology-of-marriage/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. As you said, I think people do tend to view marriage as either being something that will not change, or something that will be abolished. It is very possible for it to dramatically change, but still remain.

I agree with Betsy and Justin&#039;s description of a shift occurring from productive to hedonic marriage.  Work tends to be very independent in families today, and that trend will likely continue.

Those are all good ways of objectively categorizing marriage. Between them, I think the first one lends itself the most to subjectivity.  This is because most people aren&#039;t definitely one or the other, but somewhere in between.  Some work is shared, and some consumption is shared.  Even whether a marriage is open or closed tends to be more clear cut.

Anyway, I&#039;ve never even thought about how to categorize different marriage possibilities. Insightful post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. As you said, I think people do tend to view marriage as either being something that will not change, or something that will be abolished. It is very possible for it to dramatically change, but still remain.</p>
<p>I agree with Betsy and Justin&#8217;s description of a shift occurring from productive to hedonic marriage.  Work tends to be very independent in families today, and that trend will likely continue.</p>
<p>Those are all good ways of objectively categorizing marriage. Between them, I think the first one lends itself the most to subjectivity.  This is because most people aren&#8217;t definitely one or the other, but somewhere in between.  Some work is shared, and some consumption is shared.  Even whether a marriage is open or closed tends to be more clear cut.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ve never even thought about how to categorize different marriage possibilities. Insightful post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
